This is a comment on:
Rafelski, J.; Jones, S.E.
Cold Nuclear fusionScientific American1987
Cold nuclear fusion is dead published on Monday, 09-Apr-12 21:06:02 CEST by phiny
By late 1989, most scientists considered cold fusion claims dead, and cold fusion subsequently gained a reputation as pathological science. In 1989, a review panel organized by the US Department of Energy (DOE) found that the evidence for the discovery of a new nuclear process was not persuasive enough to start a special program, but was "sympathetic toward modest support" for experiments "within the present funding system." A second DOE review, convened in 2004 to look at new research, reached conclusions similar to the first.
Some people believe ... published on Monday, 09-Apr-12 21:09:18 CEST by phiny
A small community[quantify] of researchers continues to investigate cold fusion, now often preferring the designation low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR). They have reported that, "under certain extreme conditions", they observe excess heat effects by interaction of hydrogen or deuterium with palladium, nickel or platinum. However, they cannot explain these observations and have not demonstrated reliable replication of the effects. Since cold fusion articles are rarely published in refereed scientific journals, the results do not receive as much scrutiny as more mainstream topics, and many scientists are not even aware that there is ongoing research.